In fact, after the ‘Django Unchained’ action figures were pulled from the shelves, the price of the item on eBay reached almost $2000 for the complete set of six. Deciding to stand on moral high-ground, eBay executives banned the toys citing them in violation of their offensive-materials policy. What that policy states, basically, is products that “promote or glorify hatred, violence, racial, sexual or religious intolerance, or promote organizations with such views” are to be banned from the site.
Is the backlash against everything and, seemingly, everyone associated with ‘Django Unchained’ a bit racist, though? Had a black man like Spike Lee made this film instead of a white man like Quentin Tarantino; would civil rights groups, activists and leaders have as much to say about it? Or it is the color of Tarantino’s skin that’s causing most of the upheaval?
When is the last time you saw a trailer for a movie about slavery? When is the last time that you saw a trailer for a movie giving a creative spin on a deplorable event in American history? Many audience-goers probably couldn’t name a ‘black’ movie being produced that didn’t have Tyler Perry’s name attached. With such a lack of weighty stories being told about black history by black filmmakers, is Tarantino’s unique take on a horrific historical time truly offensive?
Washington continued, “I realized as much as my degrees and everything I’ve read on slave narratives [should have informed me], I didn’t even know that they wore masks like that, that people did that to us. It took a Tarantino movie for me to know that that’s not some crazy thing out of his imagination. That’s how it went down.”
All the backlash against film and everything associated with it begs the question: Who is allowed to report on the black experience? Can non-black people do justice to an awful event (such as slavery) that is unique to black Americans? With all the negative hoopla surrounding ‘Django Unchained’, the answer, sadly, still seems to be no.
0 comments:
Post a Comment